Double Indemnity is a movie about a woman, Phyllis
Dietrichson, who convinces an insurance salesman, Walter Neff, to give her
husband accident insurance and then murder him so that she could collect the
money and then Phyllis and Walter could be together. In the end, Walter kills
Phyllis and then Walter admits to all that he has done. Could there possibly be
any heroes in this movie?
There are two heroes in the movie Double Indemnity depending
on whose perspective is considered. In the first perspective, that of Mr.
Dietrichson, the hero is Barton Keyes, the expert claims investigator, and
Walter Neff and Phyllis Dietrichson are the villains. Walter and Phyllis
secretly designed and carried out a plan to kill Mr. Dietrichson and make it
look like an accident. They did this to get together and to gain money. Barton
Keyes did not accept the official police report that Mr. Dietrichson
accidentally died. He continued to investigate, and he found out the truth,
that Mr. Dietrichson was murdered. This means that Mr. Keyes would be the hero
to Mr. Dietrichson because he got justice for Mr. Dietrichson. Mr. Keyes would
also be the hero to the justice system itself, considering that he kept pushing
the case until Walter felt so pressured that he admitted to doing the crime. In
the end, the correct person was caught and justice was served.
The second hero of the movie, from the perspective of
Phyllis Dietrichson, is Walter Neff. Phyllis feels trapped in her marriage. She
says her husband is mean, yells, and is even abusive when he is drunk. She says
“he keeps me on a leash so tight I can hardly breathe,” and that he will not
give her a divorce. For this reason, to Phyllis, Walter would be her hero
because he saved her from her husband by killing him. Of course, she is
ultimately betrayed by Walter because he kills her at the end, but then it
could be argued that since they were both about to be caught, by killing her,
Walter saved her from going through the humiliation of being exposed as the horrible
person she really was.

I like how you organized this- think about including a working definition of "hero" to provide a skeleton of your argument
ReplyDelete